United States v. Rainbow

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
JACKSONVILLE DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA             
                                                    Civil Action
           v.                                       Case Number 96- 183 

THE RAINBOW FAMILY, et al.

PLAINTIFF'S RESPONSE TO
WILLIAM THOMAS' MOTION TO
INTERVENE AS A DEFENDANT

Plaintiff, United States of America, does not oppose the Motion to Intervene as A Defendant, submitted by William Thomas on March 15, 1996. However, plaintiff respectfully request that it not be required to respond to the Motion to Dismiss filed by William Thomas, also dated March 15, 1996, until the Court grants Mr. Thomas' Motion to Intervene as A Defendant, pursuant to Rule 24 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.

Respectfully submitted,

FRANK W. HUNGER
Assistant Attorney General

CHARLES R. WILSON
United States Attorney

(signed) REGINALD LUSTER
Assistant U.S. Attorney
Florida Bar No. 0750069
200 West Forsyth Street, Room 700
Jacksonville, FL 32201

THOMAS W. MILLET
ANJALI A. ASHLEY
U.S. Department of Justice
Civil Division
901 E Street, N.W., Room 101
(202) 514-3368

Attorneys for Plaintiff

OF COUNSEL:
Leslie Lagomarcino
Office of the General Counsel
U.S. Department of Agriculture
14th & Independence Ave., S.W. Room 2047
Washington, D.C. 20250-1400

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing Plaintiff's Response to William Thomas' Motion to Intervene as a Defendant was sant by first class mail, postage prepaid, this 29th day of March. 1996, to the following:

William Thomas
P.O. Box 27217
Washington, D.C. 20038

REGINALD LUSTER

Case Contents | Rainbow Cases | Rainbow Regulation Page
Rainbow Home Page