Letter from PCU 1/31/94
PEOPLE FOR COMPASSION AND UNDERSTANDING
P.O. Box 27217
Washington, D.C. 20038
January 31, 1994
Certified Mail No. P150 697 797
Assistant Secretary for Natural Resources and the Environment
Department of Agriculture, room 217-E
14th and Independence SW
Washington, D.C, 20250
Dear Mr. Lyons:
Thank you for your response dated January 27, 1994 to our
October 15, 1993 "Perspectives Package."
At the AFSEEE Conference in September, 1993, you told Mr.
Scott Addison that you were unfamiliar with proposed amendments
to 36 C.F.R. 251 & 261. You asked for information on the issue.
In response Mr. Addison delivered the Perspectives Package to
Nonetheless, I understand, the Perspectives Package ended up
with Ellen Hornstein of the Attorney General's office. We've
been having some misunderstanding with Ms. Hornstein. See,
enclosed, copy already sent to your office.
True, because you were unfamiliar with the issue,
material from the public comment was included for your
We suspect Ms. Hornstein may be giving you erroneous or
incomplete advice. We are not requesting "ex parte
communication. Did your staff inform you that there are less
restrictive alternatives to this regulation?
Apparently your staff informs you that permit requirements
would "comply with First Amendment requirements of free speech
and assembly." With all due respect, on this point alone
"outside the agency ... argument respecting the merits of
proposed rules" deserves your serious consideration before you
sign off on the regulation. 1 C.F.R. 305.77-3.
We suggest a meeting between the progenitors of the proposed
amendments to 36 C.F.R. 251 & 261 and all interested parties.
Such a meeting is entirely appropriate. E.g., 5 U.S.C. 609(4).
In service to peace through understanding,
...our "staff informs (you) ... much of the materials ...
appear to be copies of materials submitted during the comment
FS Regs Page | PCU Administrative Record
Rainbow in Court | Government Views | Public Views
1601 Pennsylvania Avenue