Letter from PCU 7/22/93
PEOPLE FOR COMPASSION & UNDERSTANDING
Washington, DC 20038
July 22, 1993
Senator Patrick Leahy
Re: Proposed Forest Service Regulations # 36 CFR Parts 25l - 26l
Russell Building, Room 433
Washington D.C. 205l0
Dear Senator Leahy:
We have had a meeting with your aides Brooks Preston and Mary.
We have spoken more extensively with Brooks on the phone and have
had personal contact with you through Matteo Ferreira in regards
to the new amendments to F.S. Reg. # 36 CFR Parts 25l - 26l.
Your office seemed familiar with these issues and expressed with
enthusiastic gratitude that we (as a group) have become involved.
We seem in agreement on the unconstitutionality of 26l.l0 (g);
Distribution of Printed Material and how this infringes on our
rights of free exercise of belief and expression, the First
Amendment's freedom of Speech.
We hope to clarify why a mandatory permit application process to
use the National Forest is an infringement upon the people's
right to Assemble and Worship.
Passage of these regulations will give one government agency (the
Forest Service) the power to grant or deny permits for 25 people
or more to gather on "Public Lands."
Where else can people gather other than National Forest land?
The first time the Forest Service denies a permit will be a
direct assault on not only that particular group's right to
peaceable assembly; any group (such as large families, church and
school outings, office parties) will be subject to the scrutiny
and whim of individual officials and law enforcement officers.
Regulations are being designed to protect our forest from people
and their "possible impacts" when far more destructive special
interest industries such as cattle grazing, logging and strip
mining continue to be granted use of the National Forest, often
at a monetary loss to the taxpayers and even at the cost of
Based on what criteria??? And at whose authority???
The way the amendments to the regulations read (25l.54 H 1 /
25l.54 F 5), an "authorized officer" shall grant special use
authorization to non-commercial groups upon determination that
the 7 Criteria (enclosed) are met, and the decision to grant or
deny shall be made without "unreasonable" delay.
To us that is stating: "Any Forest Service officer can grant or
deny an application whenever he or she gets around to it."
It is our opinion this gives the Forest Service sole authority to
decide who does and who does not have the right to gather in the
National Forest when in groups larger than 25, and/or leeway to
delay their decision beyond the actual date of the event.
In giving the Forest Service power to disrupt our freedom to
circulate literature and peaceably assemble, we lose our right to
petition our government for redress of grievances. These basic
human rights must be protected!!!
So - we again ask you to help us STOP These Regulations!!!
We request that your office:
We greatly appreciate the time and energy you and your office
have directed towards this matter thus far and look forward to
our continued co-operation in fighting for the Constitutional
Rights of all the people.
Very Sincerely, from our hearts,
1. Send an aide to attend the Wed July 28th meeting at
l:00 p.m. with Kathryn Way, Assistant Domestic Policy
Advisor. Please call her office for the location
2. Call Bill Svensen at the Forest Service (202) 205-l407
to oppose the regulation.
3. Call, write, or meet with:
Assistant Secretary for the Environment
United States Department of Agriculture, Rm 2l7
Washington D.C. 20250
(202) 720-4732 (FAX)
and inform him you have concerns about this regulation.
Sandy L. Hanson
423 West Oakwood Dr.
Barrington IL 60010
1832 Park Rd. NW
Washington DC 20001
FS Regs Page | PCU Administrative Record
Rainbow in Court | Government Views | Public Views
1601 Pennsylvania Avenue