Thomas P.O. Box 27217 Washington, D.C. 20038 (202) 462-0757 November 1, 1991 Rus Funk P.O. Box 73550 Washington D.C. 20056 Dear Rus, Thanks for your conscientious reply. I believe it has been helpful in better understanding your point of view. Now understand something about "womyn." Personally, I'd long discarded any notion that "man is the root of wo-man (or, ... 'womb-man')." Which might be why I had some problem making the link. Fortunately I've already cleared that hurdle, due to pressing demands for my time and energy on the streets, reading the works of Mary Daly, Phyllis Chesler, and others is not high on my priority. Certainly, I would like to understand those folks too, but I'm not corresponding with them. So my immediate question was to you: "Assuming divisions is antithetical to peace, mightn't it be counterproductive for peace activists to foster the impression of separation between humyns?" You characterize yourself as "a staunch separatist () and, rather than being divisionary, [you] find it remarkably healing and necessary...." I find this a tad confusing. In simple language I understand you to be saying that a "separatist" is not a "divisionary." It seems clear to me that division is to separation, as the pause between wars is to peace. Observing that you have a "standard practice with writing for publication," and are in "the midst of a speaking tour." I assume that you are disseminating your perceptions of "Peaceful & Loving Struggle," for the purpose of attracting (as opposed to repelling) others to your ideas for remarkable healing. The next question in perfecting my understanding of your ideas is: In order for one to subscribe to your ideas, would it be accurate to surmise, as your letter seems to suggest, that a person must separate themself from "whites, men, and heterosexuals?" If the answer is "yes," you needn't reply, I will file our correspondence for resumption if or when that idea begins to make sense. If the answer is "no," what is the alternative? For Unity and Harmony,