ATTACK ON ISRAEL CAUSES WAVE OF DISMAY IN U.S.
By Paul Taylor
Washington Post Staff Writer
Friday, January 18, 1991
; Page A23
The Iraqi missile attack on Israel yesterday triggered a wave of
apprehension across the United States, turning a day of national pride mixed
with protests into a night of worry about a widening war.
The reaction was sharp among American Jews, who greeted the news last night
with outrage, fury and fear.
"It is very terrible news to hear," said Rabbi Andrew Baker, Washington
area director of the American Jewish Committee. "It is what people were
fearing and what people had hoped would not happen."
Mark Talisman, director of the Washington office of the Council of Jewish
Federations, paused for several seconds when asked what he felt about the
attack. "Deep anger," he finally said, adding a moment later, "sorrow."
The attacks brought a sudden end to a mood of hope that had been building
throughout the first day of Operation Desert Storm, as reports of overwhelming
U.S. and allied air strikes and minimal casualties produced hopes that the war
might be brief and relatively antiseptic.
"The only unsettling thing during the day was that I heard so much
honeymoon talk from so many callers," Carole Arnold, a radio talk show host on
KTOK in Oklahoma City, said yesterday afternoon, several hours before the
missiles were fired. "I'm not sure the reality of war had set in yet."
It had for anti-war activists, who were out in force all over the country,
trying to strike a delicate balance between showing their concern and support
for U.S. soldiers and their opposition to President Bush's decision to launch
a strike.
The largest anti-war demonstrations were in New York, San Francisco, Boston
and Chicago, where protesters numbering in the thousands massed at public
buildings, blocked traffic and engaged in sporadic scuffling with police.
Anti-war rallies held on dozens of college campuses were mostly small and
quiet; they bore little resemblance to the demonstrations that gripped the
country at the height of the Vietnam War. Some anti-war students yesterday
went out of their way to voice support for U.S. troops. On some campuses and
in some cities, there were counterdemonstrations in support of the war.
Meanwhile, the nation's radio talk programs were flooded with callers
expressing pride in American troops.
"My calls today were 20-1 in favor of the war," Gil Gross, host of a show
on New York's WOR, said in the late afternoon. "It was amazing. Leading up to
the war, they were running 3-1 against. I've never seen such a turnaround so
fast. If the accents weren't the same, I would have sworn I was in a different
city, doing a different show."
"People called up wanting to talk about their pride in America," said Gene
Burns, host of a show on WRKO in Boston. "There was a great deal of excitement
that the country seemed to be working again -- the weapons worked, the command
worked. Bush, Cheney and Powell all projected a quiet competence, and didn't
seem venal."
Military recruiting offices around the country reported they were being
flooded with inquiries about enlisting. "People are coming in left and right,"
said Sgt. James Terell, in charge of an Army recruiting station in Boston.
"Some of them are saying, 'I want to serve my country.' "
News of the Iraqi attack had a sobering effect. In San Francisco, anti-war
protesters learned of it just as they were beginning what has become a nightly
parade in the city. "It just compounds the fact that there is stupidity
happening around the clock," said demonstrator Kathy O'Neill. "If only we had
negotiated in the first place," added her friend, freelance writer Rory Cox.
"No good will come of this."
Earlier yesterday in San Francisco, police arrested about 400 demonstrators
to break a "chain of humanity" around the Philip Burton federal building. They
were quickly released and then police took a similar number into custody when
the demonstration moved to the front of the Pacific Stock Exchange in the
afternoon.
The wandering body of up to 3,000 protesters appeared to represent a hard
core of social activists involved in many of San Francisco's favorite causes;
it was the first American city to offer official sanctuary to any service
member refusing to fight in the Middle East. Of 10 demonstrators interviewed
at random, nine said they were veterans of previous demonstrations -- three
against U.S. involvement in Central America, three for abortion rights, two
for protection of redwoods and one for the homeless.
In Boston, where about 1,000 protesters gathered at the John F. Kennedy
federal building, the largest banner read: "We Love and Support Our Troops.
Bring Them Home . . . Now!"
The protesters, mostly in their 30s and 40s, heard retired Boston
University professor Howard Zinn, a leading critic of U.S. policy in Vietnam
20 years ago, admonish: "A war that was wrong before it began does not become
right once it has started." Authorities said at least 40 people were arrested
for trying to block entrance to the building.
'Love the Troops, Hate the War'
In New York, protesters starting from Times Square early last night marched
down Broadway chanting new slogans they said they'd been preparing since the
war started: "Love the troops, hate the war," "Send Neil Bush," and "All it
means is Arab slaughter, we don't want your new world order."
An earlier march ended in tragedy when a car slammed into protesters on the
Brooklyn Bridge, injuring seven, two critically. The driver was charged with
drunken driving.
Here in Washington, signs such as "Bush is Now the Butcher of Baghdad"
filled Lafayette Square near the White House at the evening anti-war rally
sponsored by a broad coalition of clergy, civil rights and peace activists,
environmentalists and nuclear-freeze proponents.
"I stand here in solidarity with millions of people around the world who
deplore the action taken yesterday by President Bush," Molly Yard, the
president of the National Organization for Women, told the cheering crowd
before the news came of the attack on Israel.
Longtime peace activist Daniel Ellsberg, speaking in a voice hushed by a
sore throat, said, "We must be here in streets across the country." He was
joined at the speaker's lectern by the president of the environmental group
Greenpeace, the anti-nuclear group Sane Freeze and the co-chairman of the
African American Network Against U.S. Intervention in the Gulf. The crowd,
about 200, was not as large as it had been the day before.
"I'm surprised there is any water left in the peace glass at all given the
past American history and the tendency to gather around the president," said
Leo Ribuffo, a professor of recent American history at George Washington
University, who was not at the rally.
Singing and Chanting Stops
When Lafayette Square protesters heard news of the attack on Israel on the
radios some carried, the mood became more sober. All singing and chanting
stopped. An occasional gasp could be heard whenever the broadcasts raised the
possibility that the Iraqi Scud missiles were carrying chemical warheads.
Those unconfirmed reports -- denied later in the night by Israeli officials
-- provoked bitter reaction and painful memories among Jewish leaders.
"The central metaphor of Israel is that Jews will not be gassed again,"
said Rabbi Michael Berenbaum, professor of theology at Georgetown University
and project director of the U.S. Holocaust Memorial Museum, reacting to the
first round of news reports.
"Unlike 50 years ago, the Jews will respond," said Murray Tenenbaum,
executive director of the Jewish Community Council of Greater Washington. "The
day when you could kill Jews and get away with it is over. The Iraqis will pay
a horrible price."
Protests in Smaller Cities
In addition to the large demonstrations in big cities, there were scores
of protests in smaller cities and rural areas. In St. Cloud, Minn., 29 people
were arrested for trying to close down a federal building. In Athens, Ohio,
103 people were arrested following scuffles between demonstrators supporting
the war and those opposing it. Four people were arrested in a similar incident
in Eugene, Ore.
In Atlanta, Georgia state legislators streamed off the floor of the state
House of Representatives when Rep. Cynthia McKinney began a speech attacking
the U.S. bombing. "I just don't think it's appropriate," Rep. Newt Hudson said
as he marched out.
At Kent State University in Ohio, where National Guardsmen shot and killed
four students during a Vietnam War protest in 1970, a noon rally called to
oppose the Persian Gulf war drew about 700 students, making it the largest
campus protest in years.
But the rally turned into a balanced forum. Counterdemonstrators held aloft
a large American flag, chanted "Liberate Kuwait" and recited the Pledge of
Allegiance. Antiwar students responded by chanting, "No War for Oil."
The tense showdown eased after leaders of the opposing groups, about equal
in numbers, agreed to rotate speakers.
A 'Media-Conscious Movement'
At Columbia University in New York, another hotbed of anti-war protest two
decades ago, 500 students chanted slogans and carried banners, but there was
no flag-burning. "Everybody is saying, 'Don't burn flags, don't disrespect
troops, bring them home,' " said Chris Scheuer, 22, a senior architecture
major. "It's a much more media-conscious movement now." In the Vietnam era, he
said, "the public saw protesters screaming at the troops, spitting on troops,
and that was wrong. Nobody wants to hate them anymore."
If the intention of the demonstrations was not to stir the wrath of the
majority of Americans who, polls show, support the war, it didn't seem to
work.
"A lot of callers are angry that we're reporting on the protests," said Jim
McConnell, news director of KGO news talk radio in San Francisco. "As soon as
we do a report, we get a half dozen calls right away."
"I told my callers that there is a country where you aren't allowed to
protest, where you can get executed for disagreeing with the government -- and
that's the country we're bombing right now," said Gross of New York's WOR.
"But they don't seem interested. They want those protesters to go away
somewhere and hide for a long time."
Staff writers Michael Abramowitz, Lou Cannon, Kenneth J. Cooper, Patrice
Gaines-Carter, E.J. Dionne Jr., Laurie Goodstein, Jay Mathews, Eric Charles
May, Paul W. Valentine, Edward Walsh, Elsa Walsh and Michael Weisskopf and
special correspondents Christopher B. Daly and Jill Walker contributed to this
report.
Articles appear as they were originally printed in The Washington
Post and may not include subsequent corrections.
Return to Search Results