A CIVIL RIGHTS CHAMPION OF UNRELENTING INTENSITY
DAVID CLARKE PUTS ASIDE RACIAL CONCERNS
By Michael Abramowitz
Washington Post Staff Writer
CAMPAIGN '90: CANDIDATES IN D.C.
occ.
, in a series
Friday, August 31, 1990
; Page A01
Fifth in a series on D.C. mayoral candidates.
In many ways, David A. Clarke's rise to political prominence in the
District of Columbia followed a predictable path.
He grew up fatherless in a modest home east of Rock Creek Park, attended
public schools, received a degree from George Washington University and then
obtained a law degree from Howard University, one of the nation's premier
black institutions.
Clarke, 46, made his mark in the civil rights movement as a lawyer with
Martin Luther King Jr.'s Southern Christian Leadership Conference, and he
demonstrated for home rule in the District.
A towering, brooding, somewhat awkward man with an intensity of purpose,
Clarke embraced the politics of the 1960s, opposing the Vietnam War,
championing tenants' rights and fiercely opposing the death penalty.
When he won a seat on the first elected D.C. Council in 1974, he pursued a
populist's agenda, including the elimination of a tax on food. Eight years
later, he became council chairman by ousting the incumbent in a close race.
What sets his re'sume' apart -- and makes his rise in Washington so unusual
-- is that Dave Clarke is white.
For years, Clarke has closely identified with the aspirations of black
Washingtonians and has been treated in return with a mixture of gratitude and
suspicion. Now, as he reaches for the brass ring of the Democratic mayoral
nomination, Clarke is facing the harsh reality that a predominantly black city
may not be ready for a white mayor.
In the wake of the drug trial of Mayor Marion Barry that some say
exacerbated racial anxieties, many Washingtonians appear to be unwilling to
embrace the candidacy of a white mayoral candidate, even one whose civil
rights credentials are impeccable.
A Washington Post poll published this week showed that nearly half the
city's voters -- blacks and whites -- believe a black mayor should lead the
District. That pervasive attitude poses serious problems for a white candidate
running in a crowded primary field.
Clarke, who has drawn widespread support in past citywide races, currently
is favored by only 9 percent of the Democratic electorate, according to the
Post poll.
"I'm just not certain that at this point we need Dave Clarke," said council
member H.R. Crawford (D-Ward 7), a supporter of Clarke's rival John Ray. "We
need a strong, well-rounded black leader. Dave is very competent, but the
timing is off."
At one time, Clarke might have been frightened off by such rhetoric. In
1982, he briefly pulled out of the council chairman's race, expressing concern
about racial polarization.
He got back into the campaign after friends questioned his judgment, and he
went on to defeat incumbent Arrington L. Dixon and Sterling Tucker in the
all-important Democratic primary.
This year, Clarke says, he has no such qualms about the race factor.
"I got beyond that in 1982," Clarke said recently. "I can't do anything
about being white. So I can't sit around worrying about it terribly much. I've
already made my decision to run."
"I made that decision because I know I have the abilities to do the job and
I know what needs to be done," Clarke said. "And so I have to offer that to
the people. Now it's their choice as to whether to accept that or not."
Clarke has waged a dogged, issues-oriented campaign, characterized by the
same grass-roots-style politicking that marked his previous campaigns. He
professes an undying "faith in the people."
"They respect somebody who is part of the community, who has worked their
way up, who has paid their dues," Clarke said. "I emphasize often that this is
my first run for mayor. The first thing I ran for was not mayor. I waited for
16 years."
In a mayoral race featuring glib orators and charismatic stumpers, Clarke
is very much the eccentric.
His mayoral bid represents the first time Clarke has set up headquarters
outside of his Mount Pleasant home, but in many respects his campaign shares
much of the grass-roots feel of previous efforts.
Elderly women still show up to staff his telephone bank and stuff
envelopes. Clarke, unlike his rivals, travels without an entourage and often
shows up alone at forums. An imposing figure 6 feet 5 inches tall, Clarke
eagerly plunges into crowds, sometimes with his shirttail hanging out.
He is a walking compendium of facts and details, and is prone to lose
himself and his audiences in the minutiae of the city budget. He labors to
keep his legendary temper in check, but often gripes about his treatment by
the news media. While other local politicians cruise along parade routes in
luxurious cars, Clarke prefers to ride his 10-speed bicycle.
Last fall, to protest the abuse of carriage horses, Clarke, wearing a suit,
hitched himself to a carriage ladened with 375 pounds of carrots and pulled it
along Pennsylvania Avenue. The news media had a field day with the event and
Clarke later conceded he had made himself look foolish.
Clarke's wife, Carole, his longtime partner in struggles, sees in her
husband's eccentricities the very source of his political strength.
"People relate to him because people themselves have awkwardnesses," she
said. "Most people are everyday people, getting out there trying to make a
living. They see him as just an honest person, trying to do the best he can."
Tedson J. Meyers, a lawyer who lost to Clarke in a 1974 council race, said
that part of Clarke's appeal is that he "isn't all covered over with a
politician's finesse."
"He is the guy next door, and I may not agree with him on everything, but
at least I know where he stands," Meyers said.
As a youngster growing up in Washington, Clarke had an early taste of
adversity and disappointment.
He never knew his father, and his mother, a lowly paid clerk at the
Department of Agriculture, died of tuberculosis when Clarke was 16.
Thereafter, Clarke was brought up by an aunt.
When he was 12, Clarke got the idea of applying for a job as a
congressional page. The District of the mid-1950s was still a virtual colony
of the Congress and White House, years away from home rule, and Clarke
received a lesson in the limits of democracy: He was told he couldn't apply
because he didn't have a congressman to sponsor him.
Years later, Clarke still recalls the sting of rejection and his sense of
outrage.
"It was that day that I dedicated myself to home rule for the District,"
Clarke said.
In recalling his involvement in the District's drive for home rule and
self-determination, Clarke speaks in highly pragmatic terms. He stresses that
he never approached civil rights issues from a "messianic perspective."
"I didn't come to save people from themselves," Clarke said. "I had a stake
in this whole thing, and injustice anywhere was injustice everywhere, and the
injustice the civil rights movement was fighting against was the same
injustice that was denying my city and me home rule."
Henry A. Silva, a Baltimore pastor who knew Clarke as a young lieutenant in
the Southern Christian Leadership Conference, recalls a telling conversation
with Clarke 20 years ago in an Indianapolis hotel room.
" 'You're white,' " Silva recalls telling Clarke. " 'I just think you've
gone out of your way to do things that you don't need to be doing for us.'
Dave looked at me and said, 'I'm not doing this for you. I'm doing this for
me.' "
"It stunned me," Silva said. "Dave was unusual. While we had a lot of
whites coming into the movement, they could always leave. Dave never really
left. The movement became his life."
At first, Clarke wanted to be a preacher. He studied religion at George
Washington University after graduating from Western Senior High School in the
District. In 1965 he enrolled at Crozer Theological Seminary in Chester, Pa.,
the same seminary King attended.
But after one week of orientation and one week of classes, Clarke quit. He
said he longed for more direct involvement in the fundamental social change
that was sweeping the country. He enrolled at the nearby Upland Institute of
Social Change and Conflict Management and persuaded the administrators to send
him on a field work assignment back to Washington, where he obtained a job
with a young preacher, Walter E. Fauntroy, and his nascent D.C. Coalition of
Conscience.
In 1966, Clarke was jailed for protesting the Board of Trade's opposition
to home rule at the annual Cherry Blossom Festival Ball. He also was arrested
on the Washington Monument grounds for reading the Declaration of Independence
to a group of protesters on the Fourth of July without a permit.
At Howard University Law School, Clarke found a mentor in Frank Reeves, a
professor and a leading force in the District's civil rights movement.
Clerking for Reeves, Clarke helped organize lawyers to represent hundreds of
demonstrators who descended on Washington during the SCLC's Poor Peoples'
Campaign in 1968.
In 1974, Clarke, then a private lawyer, mounted a long-shot campaign for a
seat on the first elective D.C. Council representing Ward 1, a racially
diverse central city area surrounding Howard University.
Campaigning with a $4,000 budget out of his apartment at 19th Street and
Florida Avenue NW, Clarke proved to be a tireless candidate who capitalized on
his reputation as a neighborhood activist to win.
"All the community knew him," recalled Jerry Cooper, a retired Census
Bureau worker who is Clarke's closest friend and political mentor. "If they
needed a lawyer, they'd come to Dave. He was always open to the homeless,
every bum there was."
Today, Clarke likes to say that he is running on his record -- which
arguably is the most liberal of any of the five Democratic mayoral candidates.
As chairman of the council's Judiciary Committee in the late 1970s, Clarke
conceived of amending the city's police regulations as a means of enacting a
strict form of handgun control. The tactic was necessary because Congress had
forbidden the city to tinker with the criminal code during the first four
years of home rule.
When the four years were up, Clarke shepherded through the revisions to the
city's sexual assault, narcotics and theft laws. A stickler for detail, Clarke
also oversaw the laborious "codification" process, in which new statutes are
placed into the existing body of laws.
"I am particularly proud of that," Clarke said recently. "A democracy where
the people don't know what the law is or can't find out is not a democracy."
As council chairman, Clarke presided over the massive job of twice amending
the city's comprehensive land-use plan, the document that guides development
in the city, and acquired a reputation as one of the most knowledgeable
council members on the city budget.
At the same time, Clarke had to subordinate his own political inclinations
to forge consensus with the often-fractious 13-member council. While even his
staunchest critics concede that Clarke restored a sense of order to the
council after the stormy tenure of his predecessor, that consensus often
proved to be an elusive goal.
Sometimes, Clarke would simply refuse to compromise when he perceived an
important principle at stake. A champion of the city's tenants, Clarke lost a
bruising battle to Ray and others in 1985 when they sought to weaken the
city's rent control law. More recently, Clarke was one of two council members
who voted against the recent council move to alter Initiative 17, the city's
right-to-shelter law.
"Dave has a very genuine concern for the disenfranchised and the people who
are dispossessed -- more so than many other council members," said council
member William Lightfoot (I-At Large). "That's why you'll see him voting by
himself on issues."
Clarke's moodiness and temper -- which he describes as "intensity" -- have
hurt him politically and provoked consternation among friends and foes. He has
argued bitterly with council colleagues and he is well known for bawling out
his staff. Although he rarely loses his cool in more public settings, Clarke
can appear petulant, fussing over what appear to be minor issues of process.
Several months ago, Clarke was visibily irked when Barry invited television
crews to take pictures during what was supposed to be a private meeting on the
city's budget problems.
Other times, his private tirades are directed at the news media, with whom
Clarke has endured a contentious relationship dating back to when he worked as
a college student in the pressroom of The Washington Post.
Clarke frequently disparages what he terms the media's "sports page"
coverage of politics, and he has stewed for days over what he perceives to be
unfair or inaccurate reporting.
Clarke's strident approach to advocacy has cost him support, including some
liberal activists.
"I've seen him browbeat the hell out of well-meaning people," said Bob
Boyd, a member of the D.C. school board. "I do not think he would provide the
kind of cool, level-headed leadership that is needed. To put him in an even
hotter boiling room is not a proposition I am willing to accept."
Still, Clarke has engendered intense loyalty in friends and supporters who
look beyond his awkward personality and see a man of uncommon integrity.
Cooper said Clarke "is intolerant of inefficiency, and he gets so hung up
on things being just right that he has difficulty restraining himself."
"Maybe he's rough and lacks appropriate social graces in certain instances
because he's so interested in the big picture," said Gregory Mize, general
counsel to the D.C. Council who first went to work for Clarke in 1975.
"I see a very principled and visionary man who doesn't get blown over by
the shifting winds," he said.
Staff writer Nathan McCall contributed to this report.
Age: 46
Birthplace: Baltimore
Education: D.C. Public Schools (Western High School), George Washington
University, religion degree, Howard University Law School
Work Experience: Assistant director and Washington director, Southern
Christian Leadership Conference, 1969 to 1972; private law practice, 1973 to
1974; Ward 1 member, D.C. Council, 1975 to 1982; D.C. Council Chairman, 1983
to present.
Civic and Professional Associations: Member of Calvary Baptist Church,
District of Columbia Bar, Mount Pleasant Neighbors, American Civil Liberties
Union, Washington Urban League, NAACP, Education Commission of the States,
National League of Cities International Task Force, Improved Benevolent
Protective Order Elks of the World, Pigskin Club of Washington.
Marital Status: Married, one son.
Favorite Book: "A Moveable Feast" by Ernest Hemingway STAND ON ISSUES:
Rent Control: Supports current law. Opposed 1985 proposal to phase out of
controls.
Taxes: Does not rule out a tax increase to reduce the budget deficit. Says
he would look at utility tax revisions and tax on vacant properties, but would
not increase property and personal income taxes.
Work force: Opposes a reduction in force, but favors the use of attrition
in reducing the number of workers. Said he would order an audit of city
agencies, focusing on ways to reduce unnecessary staff in front offices of
agency directors.
Drugs crisis: Favors peer-counselor drug education programs and use of
community-oriented law enforcement, with officers working more closely with
residents. Favors increased gun control.
Education: Favors a change in D.C. Charter to give mayor and council
line-item authority over school budget. Favors curriculum designed to educate
students for job markets.
Worker's compensation: Supports a bill to expand workers' benefits.
Articles appear as they were originally printed in The Washington
Post and may not include subsequent corrections.
Return to Search Results