PROPOSITION ONE COMMITTEE P.O. Box 27217 Washington, D.C. 20038 (202) 462-0757 Date Address Dear ____: I would like to explain why, and in what sense, I would like to come in from the cold. I call myself Thomas, but even my friends sometimes call me eccentric. Since 1981, virtually 24 hours a day, 365 days a year, I've been sitting in front of the White House talking about peace, freedom, justice, equality, and spiritual values in general. That, I suppose, probably makes me eccentric. I am not asking to come in out of the cold in the sense of begging for shelter from the elements on the sidewalk in front of the White House. Rather I am asking for a lessening of the cold shoulder from the many who may have pigeon-holed me as a hopeless fringe element. Almost invariably when someone takes the trouble to tell me why I am mistaken or impractical, their reason is that I am "too philosophical," "too idealistic," or too "abstract." We may be conditioned to think of philosophy as being abstract. Let me tell you why I think it isn't. Society is governed by philosophy. Christianity, Capitalism, Islam, Communism, Zionism, Peace through Strength are all examples of philosophies which govern. Maybe everyone wants peace, but Peace through Strength, in practical terms, means peace through war. If you have any doubts just examine the hardware used to support the philosophy. This country began from the agreement that, "We hold these truths to be self-eivdent, all men are created and endowed by their Creator with certain inalienable rights, among these life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness." These self-evident truths, equality, liberty, happiness, even Creator are all ideals. So I've been unable to understand what's wrong with being idealistic. In fact I sometimes think that the problem is that we have abandoned our ideals. Our society, it seems, has traded the values of freedom, justice and equality for dollars and cents. Since Iraq has occupied the oilfields of Kuwait, the president of the United States has said that "our freedom" depends on "control of oil resources." It would not surprise me if history proves that we built nuclear weapons not to protect freedom from slavery, but merely to protect dollars from rubles. In order to realize equality, justice, freedom and peace -- and I don't think it is practical to think we can have peace without equality, justice and freedom -- I think we MUST work together. Therefore, to have peace we must have unity. Looking around I notice that there are many individuals and groups who are working for peace. I also notice that the majority do not seem to be working too well together with one another. This is where Proposition One comes in. Chairman of the District of Columbia Nuclear Freeze Advisory Board Acie Byrd's first comment about Proposition One was that "it is an idea that everyone can get behind." It's a simple idea and once people begin to think about it I believe that everyone will realize nuclear weapons are something we can live without, but might not be able to live with. I've had experiences when people refused to sign the petition, only to return hours later saying, "I thought about that, and it makes sense. I want to sign it." To me Proposition One is an idea for unity. It is an idea for equality, empowerment, democracy where the people can begin to take the initiative, creating law that serves life rather than materialism. Thus I see Proposition One as a foundation on which humanity can begin building a society based on compassion, to replace our present decaying system of retribution. I hope that you will study the enclosed material thoughtfully and either correspond with me to help uncover the root of my impracticality, or unify behind the concept. I pray Proposition One is an idea which peacemakers will be able to unify behind, because it may be an opportunity for all of us to come in out of the cold. Thomas August, l990