William Thomas P.O. Box 27217 Washington, D.C. 20038 462-0757 June 26, 1989 Dear Lee: You are in good health, I hope. But then how should I interpret your long absence? Have you had car trouble? Have you fulfilled your duty in preaching me (the/a/your) gospel? Or have you just written me off as an "evil genius," beyond the pale of redemption? As I recall the metamorphsis of our relationship: I was sitting on the sidewalk; you walked up, looked at some photographic depictions of carnage in Hiroshima and Nagasaki, and accussed me of "sopping up the floor when (I) should be repairing the broken pipe;" I replied that my purpose for sitting at that location was to understand "Truth;" you then began to recite a lengthy exposition of biblical interpretation, which, it seemed, began on the "logical" postulate that the "bible is without error;" I listened attentively; after you concluded, as intellectual honesty would appear to demand, I raised the question of apparent mathematical errors contained in the boods of Ezra and Nehemiah; I also mentioned that Sunrise was having legal difficulties which paraelled principles which had been addressed in certain Supreme Court cases involving Jehovah's Witnesses; I gave you some legal briefs concerning Sunrise's case, and you told me that you would research the question of Ezra and Nehemiah. Next time we met you told me that the problem with Ezra and Nehemiah was that one of them listed only the men, excluding the women and children. I noted that that explanation did not solve the problem, because if one writer excluded the women and children his numbers would be consistantly lower than the other writer's - and such is not the case with Ezra and Nehemiah. (Review your own correspondence to discover whether you offered any other explanation.) Yet even your most recent letter of May 10, 1989 still maintains that same explanation without answering the fact that Ezra's numbers are both higher and lower than Nehemiah's. You wonder whether Satan has turned my head with statistics. Why? Is it more deceitful to notice that a column of figures doesn't add up, and ask why, or to notice a column of figures doesn't add up, and ignore the fact? I think that I asked a simple and sincere question. Can you honestly say that you attempted to reason about my question in a simple and sincere manner? You agreed that the court decisions in the Jehovah's Witnesses' cases do "apply across the board," yet you still insist that Sunrise is "engaged in legalities with Caesar." If Sunrise is worshipping Levi, Satan, or Howdy Doody, instead of the Creator, then, I think, that is between Sunrise and the Creator. You may, of course, pass judgment on Sunrise, which, I think, would be a matter between between you and the Creator. But, if we are to be honest, the accuracy of Sunrise's religious beliefs was not the question raised by his persecution in the courts. In the Witnesses' cases the courts did not hold that the Witnesses' beliefs were true or accurate. The court only ruled that the Witnesses had a "right" to practice those beliefs. Therefore, since you agree that the decisions apply across the board, the question of whether you are so grateful for Ceasar's protection to your oun sect (Ceasar has extended similar protection to other sects, e.g., Krishnas, Scientologists, Moonies, et. al.) that you have forgotten where you came from and have become oblivious to the persecution of others remains unanswered. I may be mistaken but from my point of view our relationship quickly degenerated into a rather pointless, poorly reasoned theological, or perhaps only semantic, debate. Was this my fault? Why? It would be preferable if we could manage to build a more constructive relationship. I am enclosing some information regarding a meeting at Councilmember Lightfoot's office on Thursday. Hope to see you, if not on Thursday, sometime. Thank God,