William Thomas P.O. Box 27217 Washington, D.C. 20038 April 16, 1989 Chief, Protective Services Office Library of Congress Washington, D.C. Dear Sir, or madam: Owing to the fact that I am presently involved in the pro se litigationofan action in the FederalDistrict,andseveral actionsintheFederalCircuit CourtsfortheDistrictof Columbia, over the past four years I have an opportunity to visit the Library of Congress between three to six times a month. Until recently I had never encountered any problems on my visits to the Library. Howeverontwoof three separate visitstotheLibrary during March,1989 I was told by security officers that Iwould not be permitted to carry my knapsack into the library. OnbothofthoseoccasionsIwas,afterconsiderable discussion and a search of my knapsack, finally permitted to carry the pack into the Library. Nonetheless I was warned that, in the event that any librarian complained about the fact that I had a pack, I might still be asked to leave the library. Asexplained to the security officers, I thought thisnew process was pointless (is there some concern that people might smuggle books into the Library?), and demeaning. Iinquiredas to the authority bywhichtheseseemingly pointless and demeaning procedures were being applied to me,and wastold that the authority resided in a recent "memo." Onthe one occasion that I pressed for more specific information on this particular"memo"anofficerdid make atelephonecalland requesta copy of the "memo," but,he told me,thesupervisor with whom he spoke on the phone refused to provide a copy for my review. I do not appreciate the delay, embarassment, and seeming harrassmentwhich I have suffered on the twooccasionsrelated above. Iwould appreciate knowing the exact nature of this"memo" so that I can be assured similar incidents will not occur in the future. Thank you for your prompt attention, William Thomas