THAT AMPLIFIER IN LAFAYETTE SQUARE
HAS REAL DEMOCRACY LOST ITS VOICE?
Column: CLOSE TO HOME
Sunday, October 4, 1987
; Page C08
A recent shimmering autumn day drew dozens of blue- and white-collar
workers into Lafayette Square. Lured by the promise of a lunch-hour respite
from pneumatic drills, word processors, telephones and bosses, they opened
their quiet conversations, newspapers, sandwiches and books; some stretched
their length on the cool grass, took one last look at the reassuring canopy of
blue and fell asleep.
It was noon. At 12:03, just as the scene had composed itself for the brush
of a Seurat, a fellow equipped with an American flag and an amplifier
established himself in the midst of this rare harmony between man and nature.
He then harangued all and sundry at a decibel level that startled the pigeons,
sent the squirrels scrambling and knocked Andy Jackson's hat askew.
The reaction of the victims was disappointing. Like galley slaves under the
lash, they simply turned baleful glances at their tormentor and docilely
accepted what has come to be the inevitable in the pocket parks of Washington
-- the uninvited lecture. That it was gibberish added no increment to the
outrage. The Lord's Prayer or Washington's Farewell Address would have been
equally out of place.
A park policeman lounged by the fountain, close enough to save the man from
the spontaneous combustion of a smoldering crowd, but not at all near enough
or indeed disposed to save the crowd from the man.
I asked the officer if this assault on the privacy of everyone within
earshot was legal. He said, "Yes, the man has a permit."
"To speak?"
"Yes."
"With amplification?"
"Yes."
"This much amplification?"
Here the officer's assuredness faded. After a moment, though, he suggested
sonic beauty was in the ear of the listener, or words to that effect. At any
rate, the by-now scandalous encroachment on the public peace had not aroused
his constabulary instincts in the slightest, whereas my inquiries were
beginning to.
I left the park deep in thought, pondering the same puzzlements that have
occupied the Senate Judiciary Committee in recent days. One of their questions
had been well answered. The enhancement of one man's freedom can definitely
detract from another's -- in this case, about a hundred others. I recognized
the officer of the "peace" was doing his duty as he saw it, and that the way
he saw it somehow stemmed from his understanding of applicable law and
regulation.
Was he correct? Calling higher police authority for moral reinforcements, I
was told of a fascinating procedure that could have been invoked. Upon
complaint of a citizen in such cases, the officer notifies headquarters.
Headquarters then gets in touch with the Environmental Protection Agency. The
EPA then dispatches a specialist to the scene, armed with a sound-monitoring
device. Should this aural Geiger counter register "tilt," the offender is
warned and, if necessary, restrained.
When asked if this ingenious and efficient procedure had ever been invoked,
my source went silent. "Hello?" I said. "Not that I know of," he confessed.
What a pity to deny a fun-loving city like Washington the side-splitting
pleasure of witnessing -- and timing -- the resulting frolic. The only
remaining question is whether the film version should feature Laurel and Hardy
or the Marx Brothers.
To return to the subject: during his historic visit to these shores, Pope
John Paul made a statement we should take both to heart and to the local
precinct: "True freedom," he said, "is the freedom to do what one ought to
do." That does imply judgments that invite differences. And should the
majority uphold unbridled evangelism in public parks, I withdraw my motion.
Still, I believe that when William Pitt described the parks of his capital
city as "the lungs of London," he was referring not to the exhalations at Hyde
Park, but to the beneficent return of oxygen to grateful Londoners from their
green spaces.
"I love tranquil solitude," said Shelley, "and such society as is quiet,
wise and good." That's all the folks that day were seeking in Lafayette Park.
Has the great democracy, which drew infant breath in Shelley's time, decided
in its manhood that this is too much to ask?
James W. Symington is a Washington lawyer. He was a Democratic
representative from Missouri from 1969 to 1977.
Articles appear as they were originally printed in The Washington
Post and may not include subsequent corrections.
Return to Search Results