HOUSE VOTES ADDITIONAL HOMELESS AID
$725 MILLION LEGISLATION A PRIORITY FOR DEMOCRATIC LEADERSHIP
By David S. Broder
Washington Post Staff Writer
Friday, March 6, 1987
; Page A06
The House last night passed a bill ticketing $725 million of additional
federal aid for the nation's homeless, after narrowly beating back an
amendment that would have forced an equivalent reduction in foreign aid to pay
for the program.
The legislation, which authorizes but does not finance new assistance for
housing, health care and feeding programs, was a high priority for the House
Democratic leadership.
But Speaker Jim Wright (D-Tex.) was forced to hold open a roll call for an
additional 10 minutes while lieutenants switched half a dozen Democrats away
from support of what had been labeled a "gutting" amendment.
The amendment, sponsored in its original form by House Minority Leader
Robert H. Michel (R-Ill.), was rejected, 203 to 207, with 44 Democrats joining
159 Republicans on the losing side. At one point, 49 Democrats had been
recorded in favor of the amendment.
Final passage came on an easy 264-to-121 vote.
Earlier, an amendment by Rep. Tom DeLay (R-Tex.) that would have forced
Mitch Snyder, the controversial operator of a Washington shelter for the
homeless, to open his books for audit was rejected by a 19-vote margin.
This was the second time this year that Wright pushed the House to come up
with emergency funds to aid the uncounted numbers of homeless individuals and
families in American cities. At the start of the session, Congress shifted $50
million of disaster relief money to food and shelter programs for them.
The administration did not formally oppose the new bill, but Michel made a
spirited fight to force the Democrats to cut other spending to offset the aid
to the homeless.
Ridiculing the "sleep-in" Tuesday, in which a number of Democratic
lawmakers and Hollywood celebrities joined some of Washington's homeless in a
chilly night on the streets, Michel said that instead of "that gimmick," they
should have pressured city officials to move the street people into shelters.
Michel said there is "absolutely no excuse" for mayors to allow homeless
people "to sleep outside in the cold."
Rep. William E. Dannemeyer (R-Calif.) said sponsors of the legislation gave
"the impression . . . we're doing nothing to meet this newly discovered need."
In fact, he said, the federal government is spending $260 million this year on
direct aid to the homeless and providing $6 billion in other funds to local
governments that could be targeted to homeless programs.
But District of Columbia Del. Walter E. Fauntroy (D) said the homeless
"have outrun the capacity of our cities, our states, our charitable
organizations." Fauntroy, who participated in the "sleep-in," said, "As I lay
there freezing about 2 a.m., I asked myself how could a nation that provides
homes for MX missiles fail to provide homes for so many of its needy?"
Michel's amendment did not specify where spending would have been cut to
finance the new homeless aid. In an effort to embarrass Republicans, Rep.
Barney Frank (D-Mass.) narrowed it to require that the cuts come from foreign
aid funds -- which the administration is seeking to increase.
Rep. Henry B. Gonzalez (D-Tex.) called the Michel effort "a gutting
amendment." It took quick work by Democratic floor leaders to muster a
four-vote margin to defeat it. Only 10 Republicans deserted Michel.
The housing and health programs authorized for fiscal 1987 would total $500
million and another $225 million of feeding programs would start the following
year.
Articles appear as they were originally printed in The Washington
Post and may not include subsequent corrections.
Return to Search Results