BUILDER WINS NOD TO MOVE 1,500 TENANTS
ALEXANDRIA APPROVES RELOCATION PLAN FOR LOW-INCOME RESIDENTS
By Mary Jordan
Washington Post Staff Writer
Sunday, November 16, 1986
; Page B01
During one of the most hostile meetings recently held in Alexandria City
Hall, the City Council yesterday heard the impassioned pleas of tenants, then
reluctantly approved a developer's plan to displace 1,500 low- income
residents.
Shouting "people over profits," 250 tenants and their advocates asked the
council to reject Artery Organization's plan to remove tenants from Dominion
Garden Apartments, a 416-unit complex in Arlandria.
Artery's plan for Dominion Garden is just one facet of the change facing
Arlandria, the largely Hispanic community just south of Arlington. Several
developers are beginning to upgrade many of the apartments there, sometimes
doubling the rents, and as many as 5,000 low-income residents now face
eviction.
Displaced Dominion Garden tenants would receive between $380 and $880 in
financial assistance from the developer. The amount would be determined by the
size of the apartment and the tenants' income. The elderly and handicapped
would receive the larger payments.
However, Mitch Snyder, a spokesman for the homeless who is helping the
tenants organize, said the city should not put "its stamp of approval" on the
plan, saying it offers "nickels and dimes to people being thrown out of their
homes."
Snyder said the one-time relocation payments would not be sufficient in an
area where affordable housing has become as hard to find as "platinum and
gold."
Theresa Campos, a seven-year resident of Dominion Garden, said she has been
looking for a new home for two months. "Everyone wants me to pay more money,
almost $1,000 a month," said the native Salvadoran. "They say I can only have
three people in a two-bedroom. I have seven sons."
Dominion Garden residents pay an average monthly rent of $460 for a
two-bedroom unit. With renovation, the rent would rise to $650 immediately,
according to the developer.
The tenants' lawyer, Laura Macklin from Georgetown University Law Center's
Public Institute for Representation, asked the council not to approve the
relocation plan. She said approval would further discourage developers who
might buy the property from Artery and who have expressed interest in
maintaining Dominion Gardens as a residence for low-income tenants.
But Mayor James P. Moran Jr. said that prospects for a buy-out and a
substantial lowering of proposed rents are remote. The mayor said Artery paid
$30,000 for each of the 416 apartments, and to recover that cost, plus those
from expensive improvements, any developer would have to raise rents beyond
the reach of most of the present tenants.
After three hours of discussion, which often resembled a raucous sporting
event as tenants interrupted speakers, chanted and clapped, council members
said they believed that some kind of financial assistance was better than none
and approved Artery's plan, but with a condition.
If the city can find funds to subsidize some tenants, the developer must
allow those low-income residents to stay. If they do not, said the council,
the whole relocation plan -- which includes a pledge from the developers that
tenants violating overcrowding rules will be given more than 10 days to
alleviate the problem -- will be scrapped.
Alexandria attorney Howard Middleton, who represented Artery at the
meeting, said the developers were not prepared to agree to the council's
provision yesterday.
Moran said city officials will begin looking for possible subsidy funding
tomorrow.
Developers are not bound by law to offer relocation plans, but the vast
majority agree to provide financial assistance to displaced residents to
ensure a favorable working climate with the city.
In other action, the council approved a study that would limit to 50 feet
the height of all new buildings along Duke Street from Longview Drive to
Jordan Street. They scheduled the final vote on the issue, which business
leaders oppose and residents support, for Nov. 25.
Articles appear as they were originally printed in The Washington
Post and may not include subsequent corrections.
Return to Search Results