In its comments, the ACLU also argued that the Park Service, not
the demonstrators, is responsible for the dump-like: appearance
of the Park. We
5762
do not believe this argument to have merit. For example, the ACLU
faults the Parks Service for not seizing chairs, the exact items
that the ACLU later characterizes as "well-recognized"
demonstration materials. The group also criticized the Park
Service for not removing other items, many of which the record
shows have been seized by the Park Service and then repeatedly
returned to the Park by their owners. Finally, the ACLU
criticized the Park Service for not allowing demonstrators
to construct and repair their signs in Lafayette Park. We do not
believe that the National Park Service must allow Lafayette Park
to become a construction area.
Ten persons wrote to the National Park Service opposing the
proposed regulations because the Department of the Interior
allegedly did not enforce building height laws to prohibit the
construction of Metropolitan Square on 15th and F Streets. None
of the comments contained substantive criticisms of the specific
provisions contained in the proposed regulations. Since the
building of Metropolitan Square is unrelated to anything in the
proposed rulemaking, we simply note these commenters' opposition
in this rulemaking.
Several commenters, including the ACLU, suggested a public
meeting or private negotiations concerning this rulemaking
effort. It would be inappropriate in this instance to have
private negotiations with any one individual or group. This
rulemaking has been thoroughly and intelligently discussed in the
media, through editorials, articles and letters to the editor,
and thoughtful comments have been received from all sides of the
question. The National Park Service does not believe that a
public meeting would contribute any comments or insights not
already expressed and addressed here.
Federal Register Vol. 51, No. 43 - Continued
Case Listing | Clues
Proposition One | Peace Park |
Regs