MARY HUDDLE and PHILIP JOSEPH, et. al., )
                                        )
       Plaintiffs, Pro Se               )
                                        )   CA 88-3130-JHG
          versus                        )
                                        )   Judge Joyce Hens Green
RONALD WILSON REAGAN, et. al.,          )
________________________________________)

Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P., Rule 15, 18 and 19, plaintiffs hereby move for leave to amend their complaint a second time in order to eliminate some of the problems revealed by this Court's Order of November 28, 1988. 1/ A proposed Order accompanies.

Plaintiffs understand the fact that they have made a claim against Ronald Wilson Reagan is clear, but that exactly who the other defendants are is in some doubt.

If not for the fact that Mr. Reagan's policies are implemented by persons other than himself, it would seem as if adequate relief could be realized without joining any other defendants (see, Complaint, para. 19). Owing to plaintiffs' lack of expertise in the field of judicial procedure, however, they have experienced uncertainity in determining precisely which individuals, under Fed. R. Civ. P., are indispensable in enabling the Court to protect the interests of a society governed by law against one governed by might-makes-right official policy.

Plaintiffs know that their persons, property and pursuits have suffered as the result of police misconduct. They believe

1/ Plaintiffs apologize for any inconvenience caused the Court by the imperfections of their pleadings. They attempt to mitigate their error somewhat by admitting ignorance of procedure, and pleading exceptionally difficult working conditions. that this suffering is a direct and logically predictable result of a domestic application of the "Peace through Strength" philo-sophy (Complaint, paras. 71 and 73). Plaintiffs believe that Mr. Reagan, by virtue of his policies, is entirely responsible for this situation. While there is no desire for retribution against Mr. Reagan, or anyone else, there is a strong desire to prevent a backward slide of civilization.

THEREFORE, both to respond to inquires as to parties uttered by the Court's Order of November 28th, as well as to protect society's interest in being governed by law, plain-tiffs move for leave to perfect their pleadings in a Second Amended Complaint, which cannot prejudice any defendants.

Respectfully submitted,

________________________
Scott Galindez, pro se
P.O. Box 27217
Washington, D.C. 20038

____________________________
Concepcion Picciotto, pro se
Post Office Box 4931
Washington, D.C. 20008

_____________________________
Philip Joseph, pro se
P.O. Box 27217
Washington, D.C. 20038

___________________________
Sunrise S. Harmony, pro se
P.O. Box 27217
Washington, D.C. 20038

_____________________________
William Thomas, pro se
Peace Park Antinuclear Vigil
1440 N Street, N.W. Apt. 410
Washington, D.C. 20005
202-462-0757

_____________________________
Ellen Thomas, pro se
Peace Park Antinuclear Vigil
1440 N Street, N.W. Apt. 410
Washington, D.C. 20005
202-462-0757

I William Thomas, hereby state that, on this 2nd day of December, 1988 I caused a copy of the foregoing Motion for Leave to file a Second Amended Complaint to be hand delivered to the office of Assistant U.S. Attorney Michael Martinez, at Judiciary Square, 555 4th Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20001.

_____________________________
William Thomas