SUNRISE S. HARMONY, Appellant, aka STEPHEN SEMPLE, pro se, versus UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Appellee.
a) Whether the application of the "camping" regulation violates the Ex Post Facto prohibition of the Constitution. b) Whether the application of the "camping" regulation against appellant constitutes a Bill of Pains and Penalties.
(a) engage in a 24-hour, 7-day a week, peaceful, nonviolent vigil, protesting what appellant perceives as injustices and prejudices brought on by ignorance of, and lack of faith in, our Father-God's protection, and/or a value system based on the fallacy that might is right,
instead of the true premise that right is might, all of which has compelled appellant, through
sincerely held religious beliefs in Father-God's protection, to: (b) demonstrate a way of life, inspired by the words and deeds of Jesus, the Christ, according to appellant's own interpretations from the Bible and from his other religious studies, truth-seeking experiences, and moral principles; without having at least an insulated bag and/or blankets sufficient for keeping him warm enough to endure (sometimes) extremely cold temperatures: enough plastic to keep him dry during wet weather; literature; and other articles which might "reasonably be used during the course of a twenty-four-hour" exercise of freedom and expression of belief.
a) SUNRISE v. UNITED STATES, USApp. No. 87-3065, b) SUNRISE, ET. AL. v. UNITED STATES, USApp. No. 87-3042, c) SUNRISE, ET. AL. v. UNITED STATES, USApp. No. 87
Respectfully submitted,
Sunrlse S. Harmony,
Appellant, Pro Se
P.O. Box 27217
Washington, DC 20038
(202) 462-0757