UNITED STATES V. THOMAS
87-60, 87-64

RECEIVED
MAY 26 1987
JAMES F. DAVEY, Clerk

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

UNITED STATES )

versus ) CR87‑62

) Judge Charles Richey

WILLIAM THOMAS )

DEFENDANT'S NOTICE OF RECEIPT

Defendant pro se, William Thomas, hereby notes that:

I. On May 21, 1987 he received, by U.S. mail, a copy of Government's Response To Defendant's Response To The Government's Motion To Reconsider And Defendant's Motion For Judicial Notice, And Defendant's Motion To Reconsider Defendant's Motions To Dismiss For Lack Of Offense, Malicious Prosecution, Ex Post Facto Enforcement, Necessity Defense And Discovery, which was filed, by ASUA Linda Chapman, on May 18, 1987.

II. The Government has utterly failed to mount a serious challenge to the sincerity of defendant's beliefs.

III. There is not a hint of any "compelling," or even a rationally articulated interest which might justify the application of the regulation at issue against this defendant.

IV. The Government has made absolutely no effort to address the legal issues raised in Murdock v. Pennsylvania, 319 U.S. 105(1943), Thomas v. Review Board, 450 U.S. 707(1981), or L. Tribe, American Constitutional Law, Sections 14‑16.

Respectfully submitted,

signed

William Thomas, pro se

l440 N Street NW #4l0

Washington, DC 20005

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

UNITED STATES )

) CR 87‑62

versus ) Judge Charles Richey

WILLIAM THOMAS )

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that a true copy of the foregoing DEFENDANT'S NOTICE OF RECEIPT were hand‑delivered to Linda Chapman, AUSA for the District of Columbia, at her box in the Clerk's Office of the U.S. District Court, 400 John Marshall Place, Washington, D.C., on this _26th___ day of May, l987.

Respectfully submitted,

signed

William Thomas, pro se

l440 N Street NW #4l0

Washington, DC 20005