UNITED STATES versus Criminal No. 87-62 Judge Charles Richey WILLIAM THOMAS
(A). Mr. diGenova tells the world "...these people think they are making a statement, actually they are making a mess...," and that he's going to "clean it up." (Defendant'" Exhibit 19, April 27, 1987, hearing transcript, page 39, Washington Post, May 10, 1985.) : (B). The Government admits that its only "interest is in enforcing the regulations" (April 27, 1987, hearing transcript, page 493, but offers no explanation as to how "enforcng the regulations" legitimately helps to "clean up the Park." (C). Justly the Court dismisses the Information for lack of a "compelling Government interest." (April 27, 1987, hearing transcript, page 52). (D). Mr. diGenova, still making no effort to identify any "compelling interest," signs a Motion asking the Court to reconsider subjecting this defendant to criminal jeopardy, thereby causing this defendant emotional distraction, discomfort, inconvenience, and wasted energy. (E). The regulation at issue instructs the factfinder to consider a "camping" allegation "reasonably ...(and) in light of all the circumstances." 36 CFR 7.96(i). (F). Upon reason and belief defendant believes this continued prosecution to be without probable cause, and malicious. (G). Therefore Thomas hereby moves the Court to Reconsider Defendant's Motions to Dismiss For Malicious Prosecution and to take Discovery on the issue of Malicious Prosecution.
Respectfully submitted,
William Thomas, Defendant Pro Se
1440 N Street NW, #410,
Washington, DC 20005
(202) 462-3542
UNITED STATES versus Criminal No. 87-62 Judge Charles Richey WILLIAM THOMAS
/s/ w.thomas
William Thomas, Defendant Pro Se
1440 N Street NW, #410, DC 20005
(202 ) 462-3542