THOMAS v. REAGAN
USDC Cr. No. 84-3552
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
WILLIAM THOMAS, et al
Plaintiff Pro Se
versus CA 84-3552
Judge Louis Oberdorfer
UNITED STATES, et al
Defendants
FEDERAL DEFENDANTS' RESPONSE
TO THE COURT'S NOTICE TO COUNSEL
The federal defendants hereby advise the Court, in response
to the Court's July 29, 1988 Order, that they have no objection
to the Court taking judicial notice of the documents attached to
that Order, which were requested from and supplied by counsel for
the federal defendants.
Respectfully submitted,
(signed)
JAY B. STEPHENS, DC BAR 1177840
United States Attorney
(sgined)
MICHAEL L. MARTINEZ, DC BAR #347310
Assistant United States Attorney
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I hereby certify that this 5th day of August, 1988. I sent
one copy of the foregoing Federal defendants' Response to the
Court's Notice to Counselr via first class U.S. mail to:
Mark A. Venuti, Esquire
3600 M Street, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20007
Beverly Burke, Esquire
Assistant Corporation Counsel
3rd Floor District Building
1350 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20004
William Thomas
1440 N Street, N.W. #410
Washington, D.C. 20004
Michael L. MARTIINEZ, DC BAR #347310
Assistant United States Attorney
Room 4822 Judiciary Center
555 Fourth Street, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20001
(202) 272-9258
Contents
Case Listing --- Proposition One ---- Peace Park