UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
WILLIAM THOMAS, et al    
     Plaintiff Pro Se    
                         
versus                          CA 84-3552
                                Judge Louis Oberdorfer
UNITED STATES, et al     
     Defendants

REQUEST FOR WRITTEN FINDINGS
OF SUFFIENCY OF EVIDENCE AND POINTS OF LAW
ON FEDERAL DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

Plaintiffs incorporate by reference the Trial Brief, List of Trial Exhibits, Trial Exhibits, and Plaintiffs' Memorandum of Law in Support of Motions for Declaratory Judgment, Preliminary Injunction, and Summary Judgment, all filed September 22, 1986; Statement of Claim, filed April 22, 1986 pursuant to Order of Judge Oberdorfer; Amended Complaint (Am.Com.), filed October 19, 1985; and the original Complaint, filed November 21, 1984, and all pleadings filed in response to the Motions for Summary Judgment of Defendant Canfield, Defendant Lindsey, and Federal Defendants.

If the Magistrate will view this matter against the background of the Statement of Claim and the Amended Complaint, plaintiffs believe that the issues in dispute are readily apparent. Balancing those two documents against the Original Complaint, plaintiffs submit, it also becomes clear that the Claim has been consistently stated and modified (at Government counsel's urging) only to focus the controversy..

In the event that the Magistrate favors Summary Judgment for the Federal Defendants, plaintiffs pro se, not entirely satisfied that their oral presentations of November 14, 1986 covered all of the issues raised in the pleadings, hereby petition the Magistrate to address in writing the issues raised in the Trial Brief and the September 22, 1986 Memorandum of Law, as well as all the pleadings filed by plaintiffs in direct opposition to the Motions of defendant Canfield, defendant Lindsey, and the other Federal defendants.

A concise listing by the Magistrate of perceived factual or legal shortcomings within plaintiffs' pleadings would greatly expedite this litigation.

Respectfully submitted this 21st day of November, 1986.

____________________________________
William Thomas, Plaintiff Pro Se
1440 N Street NW, #410
Washington, DC 20005
(202) 462-3542

______________________________
Ellen Thomas, Plaintiff Pro Se
Peace Park Antinuclear Vigil
P.O. Box 27217, D.C., 20038
(202) 462-3542


Case Listing --- Proposition One ---- Peace Park