Memorandum in Support of Appellants' Motion to Govern Further Proceedings

Motion | Contents | Docket | Exhibits | Next Page

**** Index to Memorandum ***
I. INTRODUCTION 1
II. FACTUAL BACKGROUND 1
III. DISCUSSION OF FURTHER PROCEEDING IN LIGHT OF CRAWFORD-EL 2
A. DISTINCTIONS BETWEEN CRAWFORD-EL AND THE CASE AT BAR 2
1. NO LEGITIMATE GOVERNMENT INTEREST 3
2. STATUS QUO 4
a STATUS QUO ANTE BELLUM 5
B. THE CLAIMS 7
1. THREAT AND INTIMIDATION UNDER COLOR OF "CAMPING" 7
2. THE SOLE "ENFORCEMENT ACTION" 10
3. THE SIGNS 12
4. THE FLAGS 14
5. THE UNITED STATES, APPELLEE ROBBINS, ET. AL 16
a CONSTITUTIONALLY IMPERMISSIBLE ADMINISTRATIVE ALCHEMY 18
6. THE NINTH AMENDMENT 19
7. PATTERN AND PRACTICE 20
C. THE PROCEEDINGS BELOW 23
1. HEAR NO FACTS, SEE NO FACTS, CREDIT THE LAWYER 23
2. BEDROCK ERROR 24
3. THE COMPLAINT 24
4. RES JUDICATA, COLLATERAL ESTOPPEL, OR PLAIN ERROR 25
5. HOW THE IMPORTANT MERITS OF THE COMPLAINT WENT UNHEARD 26
6. THE MOTION TO DISMISS 28
7. THE ISSUE OF SANCTIONS 28
8. THE MOTION TO STRIKE 28
9. MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT 30
D. QUALIFIED IMMUNITY 31
1. STATE-OF-MIND ISSUE 32
2. WELL-ESTABLISHED RIGHT 34
3. A REASONABLE PERSON SHOULD HAVE KNOWN 36
4. A REPETITIOUS PATTERN AND PRACTICE WHICH EVADES REVIEW 37
a FACT-EVASION PROCESS 39
5. SEPARATION OF POWERS 40
IV. CONCLUSION 40