Memorandum in Support of Appellants' Motion to Govern Further Proceedings
Motion
|
Contents
|
Docket
|
Exhibits
|
Next Page
****
Index to Memorandum
***
I.
INTRODUCTION
1
II.
FACTUAL BACKGROUND
1
III.
DISCUSSION OF FURTHER PROCEEDING IN LIGHT OF CRAWFORD-EL
2
A.
DISTINCTIONS BETWEEN CRAWFORD-EL AND THE CASE AT BAR
2
1.
NO LEGITIMATE GOVERNMENT INTEREST
3
2.
STATUS QUO
4
a
STATUS QUO ANTE BELLUM
5
B.
THE CLAIMS
7
1.
THREAT AND INTIMIDATION UNDER COLOR OF "CAMPING"
7
2.
THE SOLE "ENFORCEMENT ACTION"
10
3.
THE SIGNS
12
4.
THE FLAGS
14
5.
THE UNITED STATES, APPELLEE ROBBINS, ET. AL
16
a
CONSTITUTIONALLY IMPERMISSIBLE ADMINISTRATIVE ALCHEMY
18
6.
THE NINTH AMENDMENT
19
7.
PATTERN AND PRACTICE
20
C.
THE PROCEEDINGS BELOW
23
1.
HEAR NO FACTS, SEE NO FACTS, CREDIT THE LAWYER
23
2.
BEDROCK ERROR
24
3.
THE COMPLAINT
24
4.
RES JUDICATA, COLLATERAL ESTOPPEL, OR PLAIN ERROR
25
5.
HOW THE IMPORTANT MERITS OF THE COMPLAINT WENT UNHEARD
26
6.
THE MOTION TO DISMISS
28
7.
THE ISSUE OF SANCTIONS
28
8.
THE MOTION TO STRIKE
28
9.
MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
30
D.
QUALIFIED IMMUNITY
31
1.
STATE-OF-MIND ISSUE
32
2.
WELL-ESTABLISHED RIGHT
34
3.
A REASONABLE PERSON SHOULD HAVE KNOWN
36
4.
A REPETITIOUS PATTERN AND PRACTICE WHICH EVADES REVIEW
37
a
FACT-EVASION PROCESS
39
5.
SEPARATION OF POWERS
40
IV.
CONCLUSION
40
Memorandum - Introduction
Next Page
Motion to Govern Further Proceedings
Previous Page
Introduction
Home Page
Contents
Docket
Exhibits